Legislation mandating additional
In a meta-analysis of the evidence-based literature, Mac Leod, Di Giacomo, and Tinkoff reviewed 45 articles and noted that from a public safety perspective, helmet use in motorcycle riders reduces overall death rates, the incidence of lethal head injury, and the number of non-lethal head injuries.
The risk of morbidity and mortality of helmetless motorcycle riding provides persuasive evidence for helmet use, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data concerning the cost to the general public provides support for mandatory helmet laws. “In 2010, approximately billion was saved as a result of helmet use in the U.
Ratepayer impacts of an RPS can also derail its adoption politically.States can also define what technologies are eligible to count towards the RPS requirements.Having adequate transmission capacity to accommodate generation from renewable resources is important for the success of an RPS.Each decision to repeal a helmet law sparks political, legal, medical, and ethical debate.This article examines the data regarding the effectiveness of mandatory motorcycle helmet laws and looks at the legal and ethical concerns surrounding them.
For example, in 2006 a French subsidiary of a US company was given a hefty fine for delivering certain highly technical documents and software interfaces to its employees in the English language only, and this was upheld by the appellate court.